Ran a little test on my 2016 V9 yesterday. From fill to fill 271km (168 miles), that included riding about 50km (31 miles) with the fuel light on. Diligently measured and calculated fuel economy was 4.35l/100km (54mpg). This was B-road riding in fine weather around the 90km/h (55mph) mark, not faster, not slower.
Some conclusions.
1) With the 15l tank, the actual back road cruising range before stalling is a sure 300km (190 miles)
2) The fuel economy measurements by the ECU are accurate, the average burn rate on the dash ended up being exactly the same as my manual calculations
3) The 15l tank is not so small after all, considering the better fuel economy of newer bikes. Even bikes like Honda NC750S (meant to be a very practical machine) have tiny tanks (14 liters in that case) but that is made up by good fuel economy (3l/100km or 78mpg). By gut feeling, I put it to you that the 22l tanks on the carbureted bikes of 70s and 80s were roughly equal to the 15l tank on the V9 today.
Your findings and thoughts?
Some conclusions.
1) With the 15l tank, the actual back road cruising range before stalling is a sure 300km (190 miles)
2) The fuel economy measurements by the ECU are accurate, the average burn rate on the dash ended up being exactly the same as my manual calculations
3) The 15l tank is not so small after all, considering the better fuel economy of newer bikes. Even bikes like Honda NC750S (meant to be a very practical machine) have tiny tanks (14 liters in that case) but that is made up by good fuel economy (3l/100km or 78mpg). By gut feeling, I put it to you that the 22l tanks on the carbureted bikes of 70s and 80s were roughly equal to the 15l tank on the V9 today.
Your findings and thoughts?