RJVB wrote:
This surprises me a little bit coming from you, Pete... Maybe because Guzzis have a reputation (at least among the connaisseurs) of being extremely reliably (at least once sorted out)?
Rene, nearly 30 years ago I used a Guzzi for despatch riding in London.
A lot has happened in 30 years, both to London and Motorbikes. They are no longer utilitarian tools with a 'Leisure' aspect. They are 'Leisure' tools whose utilitarian uses have been taken over by other more practical technology.
The same can be said for anywhere. Do you see the streets of Beijing or Ho Chi Min city swarming with top of the range adventure cruiser sportsbikes? No, of course you don't, because those people chose a tool for the job and don't have the luxury of leisure as we know it.
If you choose to ride something like a Norge to work every day all power to you, but never try and justify it as being either sensible or practical. even 25 years ago when i moved out of London to the West Midlands of the UK I bought myself a shitty little C90 Honda or the commuting duties. Why? Because my motorbike was my luxury and source of fun, I couldn't afford a lot of the *extras* that so many people nowadays take for granted. Why in the name of heaven would I wear out my 'Classy' bike commuting a few miles to work when a C90 was not only absurdly cheaper but better fun on the commute, you can hold 'em up on the leg guards like Rossi with both wheels drifting and all at less than 60KPH in a roundabout, outstanding. Goint to work was always a joy and cost nothing. On the Guzzi I would of constantly worried about the damage I was doing by never getting the oil hot!
If you want to just get too or from work and your commute is 30Km or less on non motorway/autostrada you have to be mad to not take a.) public transport if available, or .) a small scooter.
As I said, we have the benefit of wealth and choice, but don't ever try and tell me it is 'Neccessary' or some sort of god given right:laugh:
Pete